24
Oct 07

Search is Stateless

Category: General, Search |

In a fairly weird twist of research funding, a market research firm and AutoByTel have released a search study & press release hyping a new automotive vertical “search engine”, with study details presented very loosely in a video on AutoByTel’s PR page (QT Video). The results describe widespread user experience with failed search sessions in which the user tried really hard.

The study made the buzz at techmeme, with Calcanis hyping mahalo, Greg@SearchEngineLand beating the peronalization drum, and more inspired thinking from Marketing Pilgrim.

While it’s certainly true that a large number of searches fail, in many of these cases, the user goes on about their day. This study focuses on experiences where the user is highly motivated and continues to try and achieve information gain unsuccessfully. The specific type of personalization appropriate here is actually “contextualizaton”, or just in time personalization that is as often as not irrelevant following the session.

A great search engine, or even search engine interface, would facilitate cumulative understanding of user intent across the session in the retrieval process and help users issue more effectively consume results. Vertical search engines simplify the problem and correspondingly severely reduce the range of needs that can be addressed.

Oiy, this post is far from blogging on peer reviewed research. If you’d like to learn something more real about search behavior, take a look at a recent MSR study exposing how advanced searchers differ (across Yahoo, Google, and MSN) from non-advanced users as measured by user of advanced search syntax:

White R and Morris D. Investigating the Querying and Browsing Behavior of Advanced Search Engine Users. Proceedings of ACM SIGIR 2007, July 2007.


by andyed | About the author:

Related Posts

  • No related posts found.

Comments


Posted on Wednesday, October 24th, 2007 at 5:18 am and is filed under General, Search. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
2 Comments so far

  1. 1 Surf*Mind*Musings » SearchMe: Interesting Incremental Search UX on March 11, 2008

    [...] More consistent deliberation and fluency in the result summary evaluation processes could really help users be more productive. I’d add dwell time implicit feedback to the SearchMe UI, as well as keyboard shortcuts to nominate and demote result previews. This could directly impact the visual rendering of the results, reducing the real estate footprint of rejected alternatives and increasing the saliency of nominees. Visit status is also an obvious must have. There is a lot more potential for adding session state to search activities, but interface level state models for the SERP evaluation process is a good path of exploration. [...]

  2. 2 Alt Search Engines » Blog Archive » A Reader Looks at Engine of the Month SearchMe on June 15, 2008

    [...] saliency of nominees. Visit status is also an obvious must have. There is a lot more potential for adding session state to search activities, but interface level state models for the SERP evaluation process is a good [...]

Name

Email

Website

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Share your wisdom