<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Mozwho Notes</title><link>http://mozwho.mozdev.org/notes/</link><description>MozWho Dev/Planing Notes.</description><copyright>Copyright 2003 Andy Edmonds</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2003 17:24:23 GMT</lastBuildDate><docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs><generator>Blozom 0.1</generator><managingEditor>andyed@surfmind.com</managingEditor><webMaster>andyed@surfmind.com</webMaster><category domain="http://www.weblogs.com/rssUpdates/changes.xml">rssUpdates</category><skipHours><hour>3</hour><hour>4</hour><hour>2</hour><hour>5</hour><hour>1</hour><hour>6</hour><hour>10</hour><hour>17</hour></skipHours><ttl>60</ttl><item postdate="2004/05/07" new="true"><title>Most Frequent, New, Active</title><description>The bookmark manager &lt;a href="http://www.spurl.net/"&gt;Spurl &lt;/a&gt;gets it right with tabs for "my most used", "hot now", and "just in".&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Mozwho does the last well but the first two features are in development.&amp;nbsp; Try out chrome://mozwho/content/active.html&lt;br&gt;
</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://surfmind.com//lab/mozwho/2004/06/07/</guid><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 00:28:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item postdate="2004/05/07"><title>HTML vs XUL</title><description>Rendering bookmarks to HTML has a key advantage: link visitation status coding, e.g. the purple or blue text coloring.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Why does this matter?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
  &lt;li&gt;Not recently visited&lt;/li&gt;
  &lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;high visit count -&amp;gt; likely revisit&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;low visit count&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;no visit count -&amp;gt; todo item&lt;br&gt;
    &lt;/li&gt;
  &lt;/ul&gt;
  &lt;li&gt;Recently visited&lt;/li&gt;
  &lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;high visit count -&amp;gt; likely revisit&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;low visit count -&amp;gt; potentially an isolated context&lt;/li&gt;
  &lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
So how might we get this information into the XUL bookmark menu and
data table?&amp;nbsp; A two dimensional plot might work plotting visit
count vs time since last visit (on a logarithmic or power scale).&amp;nbsp;
By drawing a line between the axis positions and filling the resulting
region, low level visual feature extraction could likely assist visual
search.&amp;nbsp; The intensity of the fill would vary along with the
probability of revisit while the horizontal versus vertical contrast
would distinguish active from archival marks. An 8 x 8 value continuum
can be presented in a 16x16 pixel space.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
There's another factor of interest, age.&amp;nbsp; While the age of a mark
is less indicative of revistation likelihood, given last visit, it does
offer a useful memory cue.&amp;nbsp; Bookmarks in which last visit is equal
to first visit offer a special case and should be visually
distinct.&amp;nbsp; Color could be used for age though a redundant
non-color cue would be ideal.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I'm imagining a &lt;a href="http://blackbeltjones.typepad.com/work/2004/05/sparklines.html"&gt;sparklines&lt;/a&gt; style visualization.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://surfmind.com//lab/mozwho/2004/05/29/</guid><pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2004 21:16:19 GMT</pubDate><category>Ideas</category></item><item postdate="2004/03/01"><title>Trailblazer</title><description>Slashdot covers a OS X browser thing that takes advantage of the OS level thumbnailing to offer a &lt;a href="http://apple.slashdot.org/apple/04/03/31/0513245.shtml?tid=126&amp;amp;tid=185&amp;amp;tid=95"&gt;history map&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Very nice.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Not happy with the name though, curating and &lt;a href="http://surfmind.com/lab/mozwho/2003/05/22/"&gt;sharing trails&lt;/a&gt; is as
important and move novel than &lt;a href="http://surfmind.com/lab/mozwho/2003/05/02/"&gt;non-tree trimbed&lt;/a&gt; history w/&lt;a href="http://surfmind.com//lab/mozwho/2003/09/04/"&gt;thumbnails&lt;/a&gt; and is due it's
initial limelight.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=459279#459279"&gt;Mozillazine forum thread&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://surfmind.com//lab/mozwho/2004/03/31/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2004 20:57:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item postdate="2004/02/27"><title>Mozwho 0.4</title><description>The new release is a significant upgrade from the 3.x series:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
  &lt;li&gt;everything is now a real link&lt;/li&gt;
  &lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;facilitates keyboard nav using type ahead find (hit "/" and type)&lt;/li&gt;
  &lt;/ul&gt;
  &lt;li&gt;search results now have a separate URI&lt;/li&gt;
  &lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;this enables a search box plugin and bookmarking searches&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;search still only operates on the bookmark name&lt;/li&gt;
  &lt;/ul&gt;
  &lt;li&gt;better CSS&lt;/li&gt;
  &lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;in an effort to enable alternate skins, use of ids and styles has been improved&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;a sample alternate has been checked in (mozwho_desert.css)&lt;/li&gt;
  &lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
Get it on the &lt;a href="http://mozwho.mozdev.org/installation.html"&gt;installation page&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://surfmind.com//lab/mozwho/2004/03/27/</guid><pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2004 15:42:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item postdate="2004/02/14"><title>Firefox Mozwho Search Plugin</title><description>You've got to love open source!&amp;nbsp; I've been planning to write a firefox search plugin for mozwho for a few weeks now, but &lt;a href="http://www.samespirit.net/ricky/news/14-03-2004"&gt;ricky @ samespirit&lt;/a&gt; took care of it.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Get it now and make your bookmarks more useful.&lt;br&gt;
</description><guid isPermaLink="true">http://surfmind.com//lab/mozwho/2004/03/14/</guid><pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2004 16:32:46 GMT</pubDate><category>Code</category></item></channel></rss>
